HAZOP: Hazard and Operability Study Explained

Two engineers discussing a HAZOP study in the manufacturing industry

Summary: In an environment where safety is paramount, identifying potential risks before they escalate is crucial. HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) has proven to be one of the most valuable methodologies for pinpointing and mitigating such hazards. This structured analysis is widely used across industries like chemicals, pharmaceuticals, oil and gas, nuclear, and mining to systematically evaluate complex processes for safety gaps. It enables organizations to identify potential weaknesses early and take corrective measures before incidents occur. 

What is HAZOP?

A HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) is a systematic risk analysis tool used to identify potential hazards in industrial processes before they cause incidents. Commonly applied during the design phase of new facilities or when processes change, it helps ensure safety, equipment integrity, and productivity. The method breaks down systems into smaller units, called nodes, which are analyzed to detect deviations from the intended design or operation. A multidisciplinary team reviews each node to uncover risks that could affect safety or efficiency, producing a detailed report with recommendations for risk mitigation. HAZOP identifies potential failure points and their root causes, allowing organizations to take corrective actions and implement safeguards to prevent these issues from occurring. It is recognized as a key Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) method and included in OSHA’s Process Safety Management (PSM) standard.

HAZID vs. HAZOP vs. Risk Assessment

Risk management in complex systems requires multiple tools to identify, analyze, and mitigate hazards effectively. HAZID, HAZOP, and Risk Assessment each contribute to this process by focusing on different stages of risk evaluation, ensuring that all potential hazards are addressed comprehensively.

HAZID 

HAZID is a proactive method used early in the design phase to identify potential hazards. By focusing on high-level risks, it allows teams to anticipate and mitigate threats before they escalate, providing a foundation for further analysis.

HAZOP 

Unlike HAZID, HAZOP offers a detailed, systematic review of the design and operational processes. A team of experts examines how deviations from normal operations could lead to safety issues or system failures, ensuring a thorough understanding of potential risks.

Risk Assessment

Building on the insights from HAZID and HAZOP, Risk Assessment evaluates the probability and impact of identified hazards. This helps prioritize which risks need immediate attention and informs mitigation strategies to minimize overall risk exposure.

HAZOP Analysis process

The HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) process is a rigorous method used to identify hazards and operational challenges within complex systems. Here’s a concise breakdown of the HAZOP process:

1. Define Scope and Objectives

Establish the study’s boundaries by selecting the system or process to be analyzed and defining the goals and key outcomes of the analysis.

2. Build a HAZOP Team

Form a multidisciplinary team of experts from engineering, operations, maintenance, and safety. Team members must be trained in HAZOP methods and understand the system in detail.

3. Identify Nodes

Decompose the system or process into smaller, manageable sections called nodes, such as individual equipment, control systems, or operational steps, for focused analysis.

4. Define Parameters

For each node, list critical process parameters like temperature, pressure, flow rate, and chemical composition. These factors are essential for safe and effective operation.

5. Select Guidewords 

Analyze each node systematically using predefined deviation guidewords like “no,” “more,” “less,” “part of,” “reverse,” and “other than” to identify possible operational failures or design deviations.

6. Evaluate Consequences, Causes, and Safeguards

For each identified deviation, assess the potential consequences, causes, and existing safeguards. This includes evaluating risks to people, equipment, and the environment, and ensuring appropriate preventive measures are in place.

The Four Phases of the HAZOP Method

A HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) analysis, conducted by a skilled multidisciplinary team, systematically examines the safety aspects of both planned and existing processes. It aims to identify and assess risks that could harm health or disrupt operational efficiency. The analysis unfolds in four clear phases:

1. Definition Phase

In the Definition Phase, the team assembles, assigns roles, and outlines the scope, objectives, and responsibilities. Critical elements such as system boundaries, interfaces, and assumptions are defined to ensure focus.

2. Preparation Phase

The Preparation Phase involves gathering necessary data, setting schedules, and preparing templates for documenting findings. This ensures the analysis proceeds with all the relevant information at hand.

3. Examination Phase

In the Examination Phase, the team identifies all components of the system to be analyzed. They establish acceptable limits for deviations from the desired state and evaluate potential impacts of identified issues. Safety measures, detection procedures, and corrective actions are also discussed.

4. Documentation Phase 

The Documentation Phase consolidates all findings into a comprehensive report, providing actionable insights and detailed records for future reference and implementation.

HAZOP Guidewords and Parameters

HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) relies on guidewords and process parameters to systematically identify potential deviations in a process. Guidewords are specific terms used to trigger analysis of how a process might deviate from its intended operation. Common guidewords include NO, MORE, LESS, AS WELL AS, PART OF, REVERSE, and OTHER THAN. These words are combined with parameters to explore various potential issues.

Parameters are key process characteristics such as FLOW, PRESSURE, TEMPERATURE, and LEVEL, or operational factors like MAINTENANCE, START-UP, and SHUTDOWN. Each parameter represents an aspect of the process that could deviate under certain conditions. When guidewords are applied to these parameters, they form a deviation matrix, which helps the HAZOP team identify hazards and explore their causes, consequences, and any mitigating actions or residual risks.

 

Table with HAZOP Guidewords and Parameters for deviations

Together, guidewords and parameters guide the HAZOP team through a structured analysis, allowing them to uncover not only how the process might fail, but also to assess the impact and necessary safeguards. This approach, while developed for industrial processes, is applicable across various domains to anticipate failures and improve safety and operability.

HAZOP Report

A HAZOP report serves as the cornerstone for communicating findings and recommendations to all relevant stakeholders, such as management, operations, maintenance, and safety teams. Clarity, conciseness, and comprehensiveness are key attributes of an effective HAZOP report. Using HAZOP software like flowdit simplifies this task, allowing leaders to focus on facilitating the study rather than on administrative details. The software enables better control over the team, highlights critical issues, and streamlines access to checklists and supporting documents. Real-time documentation facilitates seamless updates and adjustments, ensuring recommendations are quickly implemented. This not only enhances safety and process improvements but also ensures the HAZOP report remains an efficient and effective tool for hazard analysis.

 FAQ I HAZOP 

HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) is a systematic method for identifying risks and operational issues in processes. It involves analyzing potential hazards through brainstorming sessions and guide words. It is vital in design phases to ensure safety and efficiency in operations. It emphasizes proactive risk management. The process is driven by a team of cross-functional experts.

A node is a specific part or section of the process being analyzed. It could be a piece of equipment, a piping section, or a control system. Each node is examined for potential deviations in design intent. The analysis of nodes helps break down complex processes into manageable parts. A thorough review of each node ensures that all aspects of the process are considered.

The HAZOP team should include process engineers, safety experts, operations staff, and quality managers. Involving cross-disciplinary professionals ensures all perspectives are considered. Each team member brings expertise in their respective fields. External consultants may be invited for specialized knowledge. The broader the team, the more robust the analysis.

Deviation analysis identifies where a process might deviate from its intended operation. It’s critical to understanding how these deviations could lead to safety hazards or operational inefficiencies. This analysis is guided by the use of structured questioning. It ensures no aspect of the process is overlooked. Deviation analysis forms the backbone of any HAZOP study.

Findings are documented in a HAZOP report, which includes details of each deviation identified, potential consequences, and suggested actions. Each recommendation is prioritized based on risk severity. The report also tracks the status of corrective actions. Clear documentation ensures transparency and accountability. It also serves as a reference for future reviews.

HAZOP studies help organizations meet safety standards and regulatory requirements by identifying and mitigating potential risks. Often they are a part of safety audits for compliance with standards like OSHA or ISO. Regulatory bodies may require documented HAZOP studies for high-risk processes. A well-conducted  study provides evidence of due diligence in risk management. It supports continuous improvement of safety practices.

While both aim to identify risks, HAZOP focuses on operational issues and hazards in a process. FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) primarily analyzes potential failure modes and their effects. HAZOP is more suited to complex systems with interactive components. FMEA is often used for product design and component failures. Both are complementary tools in risk management.

It is most effective during the design and planning stages of a project. It can also be used to review existing operations or when a system undergoes significant modifications. Performing it early helps prevent costly safety or operability issues later. Regular reviews throughout the system lifecycle are recommended. It should also be conducted after incidents to identify root causes.

A common misconception is that it is only for large, complex systems. In reality, it’s applicable to any process, regardless of size. Another misconception is that it is a one-time exercise, but it should be conducted regularly throughout the lifecycle. Some also think that HAZOP can replace other risk management tools, but it should complement, not replace, other methods.

Copyright © SeventyFour – depositphotos.com

Arne Reis

Founder

Arne Reis, Founder of flowdit

Process optimizer with 25 years of expertise, focused on operational excellence in quality, maintenance, EHS, and commissioning. Emphasizes innovative solutions and top-quality standards.

Facebook
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn